Does the State Really Exist? A Perspective from the Transcendent Philosophy of Mullā Ṣadrā

Cecep Zakarias El Bilad
46 8

Abstract


This research comes from a simple question whether the state exists in the real world or is only a fiction in the mind. In International Relations (IR), the state is often conceptualized as if she is an individual that has certain qualities of personality. The concept, however, is actually considered as a metaphor only or an as if person. What really exist in the extra-mental world are those individuals “in” it. If that is the case, then why the effects of its existence are so real and can be felt by everyone? And, how can IR be scientific while its object of study is a fiction? The neglect of the state’s existence is rooted in the empirical epistemology held by most IR thinkers and students especially since the wave of scientification of the discipline began in the 60’s. They hold the empirical view that knowledge stems primaliry from the sensory experience, and anything beyond it has no certainty. The similar neglect is, in fact, shared also among non-empirical IR thinkers coming about in the later decades such as postmodernists and constructivists, because of their idealist ontology that there is no any objective reality but constructed discoursively. This research wants to analyze the ontological status of the state from the perspective of Mullā Ṣadrā’s transcendent philosophy. His philosophical system that primarily concerns on the existence qua existence and the existential structure of realities, serves as the foundation of any discussion about the existence of entities, without exeption that of the state.


Keywords


Existence, Reality, State, Soul, Individual, Society, Mind

Full Text:

PDF

References


Thomas S. Kuhn, the Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second Edition, Enlarged) (Chicago: the University of Chicago Press, 1970), 10-11.

H.F. Holsti, “States and Statehood”, in Richard Little and Michael Smith (ed), Perspectives on World Politics (Third Edition) (New York: Routledge, 2006), 19.

Holsti, States and Statehood, 18-19.

Erik Ringmar, “On the Ontological Status of the State,” European Journal of International Relations (New York: Sage Publications, Vol. 2:4, 1996): 439-466.

Based on the Hobbesian doctrine, neorealists believe that anarchy is the basic character of the international system. International relationship is built upon the mutual motivation to defend, compete and dominate each other. At the international level, between states, there is no Leviathan to control and organize the anarchy. Robert M. A Crawford, Idealism and Realism in International Relations: Beyond the Disciplilne (New York: Routledge, 2000), 32 & 36.

Robert Gilpin, “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism,” International Organization (Massachusetts: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the World Peace Foundation, Vol. 38 No. 2, Spring, 1984): 301.

Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus The State (Idaho: the Caxton Printers, Ltd, 1960), 141.

Spencer, The Man Versus The State, 65.

Anjan Chakravartty, A Metaphysic for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 8.

Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 216.

Wendt, “The State as Person in International Theory,” Review of International Studies (London: British International Studies Association, Vol. 30, 2004), 309-310.

Wendt, The State as Person in International Theory, 311-313.

Wendt, The State as Person in International Theory, 311-313.

Wendt, The State as Person in International Theory, 314.

Robert Audi, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge: Canbridge University Press, 1999), 684.

Audi, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 686.

Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, 49.

The concept of the state as a new model of social organization is born in the 17th century in Europe. Only in the 20th century, through the long history of European colonialism, it was agreed globally as the model of an ideal social organization. See Holsti, States and Statehood, 23; Mathias Albert, et al., Identities Borders Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 2001), 34.

‘Abd al-Raḥmān Ibn Khaldūn, The Muqaddimah: an introduction to history, trans. Franz Rosethal (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969), 475.

‘Abd al-Raḥmān Ibn Khaldūn, Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldūn (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 2001), 160-161.

Ibn Khaldūn, Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldūn, 121-122.

Ibn Khaldūn, Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldūn, 121-122.

Ibn Khaldūn, Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldūn, 109-110.

Ibn Khaldūn, Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldūn, 121.

Murtadha Muṭahharī, Masyarakat dan Sejarah: Kritik Islam atas Marxisme dan Teori Lainnya (Bandung: Penerbit Mizan, 1993), 15.

Muṭahharī, Masyarakat dan Sejarah, 15-18.

Muṭahharī, Masyarakat dan Sejarah, 21.

Muṭahharī, Masyarakat dan Sejarah, 21.

Muṭahharī, Masyarakat dan Sejarah, 22.

S.M. Khamenei, Mullā Sadrra’s Trancendent Philosophy (Teheran: SIPRIn, 2004), 50.

Ibrahim Kalin, “Mullā Ṣadrā’s Realist Ontology of the Intelligibles and Theory of Knowledge,” The Muslim World (Istambul: ISAM, Vol. 94, Issue 1, Januari, 2014): 9.

‘Abd al-Jabbār ar-Rifā’ī, Durūs fī al-Falsafah al-Islāmiyyah: Sharḥ Tauḍīḥī li Kitāb Bidāyah al-Ḥimah (Iran: Al-Hadi, 2000), 152-153.

Mullā Sadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah fī Al-Asfār al-‘Aqliyyah al-Arba’ah (Beirut: Dar al-Iḥyā al-Turats al-‘Arabi, 1981), V. 1, 39.

Fazlur Rahman, The Philosophy of Mullā Sadrā (Albany: SUNY Press, 1975), 28.

Ṣadrā, Al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 2, 289; Khamenei, Mullā Ṣadrā’s Transcendent Philosophy, 52.

Rahman, The Philosophy of Mullā Sadrā, 28.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 1, 87.

Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Three Muslim Sages (New York: Caravan Books, 1997), 25-26.

Rahman, The Philosophy of Mullā Sadrā, 34-35

Ṣadrā. Al-Ḥikmah al-Mutāliyyah, V. 1, 434.

Ṣadrā, Al-Ḥikmah al-Mutāliyyah, V. 1, 433-434.

Ṣadrā, Al-Ḥikmah al-Mutāliyyah, V. 1, 433-434.

Khamenei, Mullā Sadrra’s Trancendent Philosophy, 82.

Khamenei, Mullā Sadrra’s Trancendent Philosophy, 82.

Muṭahharī, Durūs Durūs Falsafiyyah fī Sharḥ al-Mandhūmah (Lebanon: Shams al-Mashreq for The Cultural Services, 1994), V. 2, 3.

Muṭahharī, Durūs Falsafiyyyah, V. 2, 3.

Mohsen Gharawiyan, Pengantar Memahami Buku Daras Filsafat Islam (Jakarta: Sadra Press, 2012), 62.

Gharawiyan, Pengantar Memahami Buku Daras Filsafat Islam, 62.

Muṭahharī, Durūs Falsafiyyyah, V. 2 8.

Muṭahharī, Durūs Falsafiyyyah, V. 2, 27.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V.3, 337.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V.3, 339.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 3, p 377-378.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 3, 318.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, (Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008), 475.

Khalid al-Walid, Perjalanan Jiwa Menuju Akhirat: Filsafat Eskatologi Mullā Ṣadrā (Jakarta: Ṣadrā Press, 2012), 49.

Ṭabaṭaba’ī, Bidāyah al-Ḥikmah (Qom: Muassasah an-Nasyr al-Islami, No. Year ), 88.

Muhammad Kamal, “Dressing after Dressing: Ṣadrā’s Interpretation of Change,” Open Journal of Philosophy (SciRes, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.31009, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2013); 58; Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 3, 62.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 8, 129-130.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 8, 130.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 8, 136.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 3, 377-378

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 3, 382.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 3, 382.

Muṭahharī, Masyarakat dan Sejarah, 15.

Muṭahharī, Masyarakat dan Sejarah, 15-18.

Ṣadrā, al-Ḥikmah al-Muta’āliyyah, V. 3, 315-316.

Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, 47-50.

Ṣadrā, Ash-Shawāhid ar-Rubūbiyyah fī al-Manāhij as-Sulūkiyyah (Mashhad: Meshed University Press, 1967), 363.

Ṣadrā, Ash-Shawāhid ar-Rubūbiyyah, 365.

Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1651/1968), 185-186.